As part of its ongoing First Amendment Initiatives, Catholic Law hosted the fourth annual Seigenthaler Debates on Wednesday, March 12. The event, co-sponsored by the Law School’s Federalist Society and American Constitution Society chapters, brings together prominent First Amendment scholars each year to debate pressing constitutional issues.

This year’s debate, held virtually, centered on the resolution: “Resolved: Governmental Destruction of a Traditional Site of Worship on Government-Owned Property Requires a Strict Scrutiny Analysis under the First Amendment.” Representing the Pro position was Josh McDaniel, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Faculty Director of the Religious Freedom Clinic, where he guides students in representing a diverse array of religious clients. Arguing the Con position was Lael Weinberger, an associate at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in Washington, D.C., specializing in litigation, appellate law, constitutional law, and administrative law.

The debate was moderated by Judge Paul B. Matey of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Before his judicial appointment, Judge Matey served as General Counsel at University Hospital Newark, Deputy Chief Counsel to Governor Chris Christie, an Assistant United States Attorney in New Jersey, and a partner at Lowenstein Sandler LLP.

Following opening remarks and introductions by Professor A.G. Harmon, Associate Dean of Bench and Bar Programs, the debate began, offering a dynamic exchange of ideas on the constitutional implications of the resolution.

A recording of the 2025 Seigenthaler Debate is available below for those who wish to explore this engaging discussion.